- Expectation
- The world seems in such a mess that one wonders
if we can come out one day.
But if we do not find a solution, no need to worry !
The monotheistic religions agree that anyway,
this chaos is promised to an end and thereby our sufferings too.
While waiting for this climax, humans are left to their own devices.
To kill the time, they are spoiled for choice,
but they are in favor to ruin the Earth and the lives of their fellows.
Nonbelievers work with no hope at all.
The others work without forgetting to bet a few dollars
on the recognition of their merits, for the day when they will no longer be.
But the return of God, oh yeah ! It would be something else anyway !
Burning with impatience, how many did not read in the sky
a precursor sign of the landing of the leader, his army and his laws ?
Alas, in view of the imbroglio of the world, we should say that he has gone AWOL.
Maybe he has gone fishing and all busy watching his lines,
he has eaten his promise of eternal assistance
to remarkable humanity.
Anyway, no need to complain,
It is said that He will return only the day that He has decided.
- Muddle
- So here we are condemned to stand each other,
but that is not without raising a question.
If the end is as stated, it means that we knew
from the beginning that nothing good would come out of the man.
Then time would be useless ?
What about all the sufferings endured, especially
the most delicious that man has imagined and imposed to himself ?
Were they intended just to keep man away from monotony ?
Nothing to mark a path of coherence or to discern any
way of salvation ?
In my opinion as human, this scenario seems to me a bit cruel
even a little sadistic.
Hmm ... but it doesn't make sense !
Because otherwise the sacrifice on the cross would be totally superfluous.
As a reminder, let's summarize what it highlights :
- the alliance is reaffirmed. He does not lose interest in men
- primacy to the free will and expression of humans
- a freely consented sacrifice, a freely expressed judgment that leaves us as orphans,
condemned to learn by ourselves
- no interference, even in the worst circumstances.
The present bears only the signature of the man
- but also, Life is a little larger than what men hold her for
But if we can accept that man is accustomed to incoherence,
we must deny it to God because it is antithetical to its nature.
So, for the grand finale, we have to reject the idea of an authoritarian landing
decided to put this fool of man on the right path.
This would seal the bankruptcy and the abandoning of the "human project",
as if it has been sheer madness to have hoped in him.
So, if one day, God comes to support the man,
it will be first and foremost ... by the spirit.
How to consider this possibility ? Is it an unspeakable
damage to the integrity of your person,
or could you possibly accept it ?
This seems not so simple in this era devoid of meekness, openness and imagination.
How to make it perceive that the whole thing is perhaps not only material ?
It's not won as you can see with the following bits and pieces.
- Men's hunger
- "By the spirit ? By the spirit !
What a bunch of nonsense ?
Spirit is only a view of the mind.
It is not a tangible reality.
Besides, spirit does not feed a man.
When we see bloody hell how hard we try,
jujus, icons, grimaces, sacrifices, rituals, appearances, anathemas...
how can God stay deaf to so many calls ?
Who would not respond to such a supplication ?
How to ignore such devotion ?
What an ungrateful person if He does not come in person !
And then we love Him, He who is so high, He who is so powerful
and which we fear the thunderbolts.
He could also allow us
to escape this nasty, ugly world
and his ruthless corollary, the death
that hangs over our heads since the first day.
So please, be wise, comme on, listen to us, come back !
Hmm ... Before convoking God, should not we convoke the man ?
- The hunger of the world
- Now imagine that God did not go fishing but is lurking,
hands on his head for not to be tempted.
He is not in the distance and absent but sighs, prostrated in the lining of the world.
"My project is the freedom offered to man.
If I interfere, man will be deprived of it and instantly downgraded to the state of puppet.
I'm just allowed to place at his disposal a wave of spirit
but it's up to him to decide to access or not.
I do not want an army of yes-men,
zealous idolaters unable to acquiesce to life.
I can't rejoice in flattery and I feel uncomfortable with praises of unfulfilled beings.
If they declare to love life, they immediately hasten to spoil it.
If they declare to love me, they refuse to challenge themselves.
The human is the strong arm of the man, it is up to him to go for the jackpot.
I want them human and man, free."
Under these conditions, which of the two parties is the most consumed by hunger ?
For which the waiting seems endless ?
Which one is the most present, the most faithful, the most reliable ?
Which one has already done his share of the work ?
Which one is the fat lump ?
In view of the performance given by the human, can he still believe in man ?
And if actually we were not up to the challenge ?
Imagine now that our dimensions do not embody the heart of the world
but are only a tiny suburb.
This facetious representation of space, suggest that in a way,
every human being rests directly on God.
God stands in free access,
He's just waiting for people to make room for him or not.
Such geometry gives everyone the same free access, without intermediary,
the same rights.
But then what incompetence from us !
And how to look at these sermonisers
"He's by here ! To please him, you have to do this and that",
so quick to bring shame and anathema on the first who does not venerate them ?
They call themselves doctors, but of what law ?