Double-Faced

"Extra-spoliation"
Imagine that the foundation of man is freedom. But freedom is not biological, it is not an emanation of the body. Therefore if it is attached to the man it is through his spirit.
Shouldn't we then look at the man differently ? We are ecstatic about this paragon of the evolution, straight out of the ground, but could it not be a "very different thing" opportunely projected in the human, first choice terrestrial beast ? What we named "man" would then be an alliance. The visible side would be the human, the underlying face the man and the Earth would be a luxurious field of expression.
The human is an animal that is full of capacities but then would't it be as part of shadow of man ? However, none are immediately available to him. It takes a lot of effort to highlight a talent. It's a bit like man was buried in the human but that this one offered him just a limited interface. Thus in the course of his life, every human extricates what he can from his nature as a man and that according to his predispositions, his stimulations, his choices, his zeal.

Really a beast, really dump
Being tieds hand and foor, the adhesion of man to the human is so perfect that we swear they are one. Only the irremediable failure of the body that "gives up the ghost" releases the man and thus marks the end of his lease of expression.
Thus we are camped on our Earth. No doubt that from animals we are the kings, because we do more than follow the codes, we sublimate them. If "territory, domination, law of the strongest" constitute the foundations of the animals civil code developed for their survival, the human, backed by the splendor of his genius, declines them in a variety of shades and combinations. Just a short summary of his virtuosity : cruelty, barbarism, greed, arrogance, careerism, scheming, hypocrisy not to mention pillars such as conceit, individualism, navel-gazing, disregard. Sure she is not born the stupid beast who could pretend to surpass us !

HumanMan
Human and man at one at the same time ? What about this funny couple, about this union of a carp and a rabbit ? One believes himself only master on board, while the other is silenced. It's only when the first is subject to a heavy failure that the second can emerge and gently express himself.
On a daily basis, the crew is eminently dedicated to their reptilian brain, not only for the necessary - what is acceptable  - but also for the superfluous. Yet no one asks us to play the animal. But when the human has taken control, too bad for the man that would be wise to stay in the lines. The master intends to take advantage of everything that his arms can reach or comfort him in the greatness of his person.
Sometimes we tell ourselves that the condition of "pure animal" suits us perfectly, especially because our rapacity rages flawlessly with regard to our fellow humans, the living and the whole planet.

Human comedy
But let's not forget the benefits of civilization. Between two acts where she denies herself, she seeks to open new horizons for human. Certainly, the thrill is fleeting and looks like more coquetry than conviction. But let's bet that one day the organization of men will forsake his nonsensical plans to wonder about his own discernment.

Let's try one moment to embody this human-man alliance. How do we feel in the role of this twin with just one body and one head ?
A fear arises. How can I be sure that I do not harm my passenger ? Am I really at the service of this double of which I am not quite aware but of which I am the only spokesperson. You suddenly agree that your person may be a means and not a goal and you grasp your level of responsibility.
But then, do you have to laugh or cry of all that revolves around you ? In the same breath you feel ready to laugh and cry, of everything. You are stunned by the vain spectacle of the thirsty of all kinds. Would not they ride the human inappropriatly ? You are also sorry for these champions of humanity, who, wearing imbecility like a trophy, advocate violence and scheming in order to sit the world at their table.
Impasse and abomination, here is the signature of the ignorance of the granularity of man.

Geometry
So we are faced with a new model for the man, defining another geometry. Let's sum up.
Freedom is an absolute. It exists independently of us, whatever happens, whatever one did. We do not know much of man except that freedom flows within him and that he is the poor relative of the human, his earthly proxyholder. Therefore human life seems a bare confrontation of man with freedom.

That's where we are. One may be tempted to blame on the spot a theory that seems twisted and foreign to the common reason. Yet its essential is elsewhere. Wouldn't it help us to look simply at things held until then for abstruse ? Our hypothesis in mind, let's approach the usual representations of man and his spirit.